Two Different Kinds of Protection, Aimed at Two Different People
"Asset protection" gets used as a single phrase, but it usually means one of two very different things depending on whose creditors you're worried about.
One version protects you — the person creating the trust — from your own future creditors, while you remain a beneficiary of assets you contributed. We cover that tool, Utah's domestic asset protection trust, in Utah Asset Protection Trust: Requirements and How It Works.
The version covered here protects someone else: your child, grandchild, or another beneficiary, from their future creditors, lawsuits, bankruptcy, or divorce — using a trust you create and control, that they did not create and do not control. The legal mechanism is different, the statute is different, and the planning conversation is different. Many estate plans should include both.
Why an Outright Inheritance Is Exposed
When a beneficiary receives an inheritance outright — a lump-sum distribution from a will or trust, deposited directly into their own account — it becomes their property in every legal sense, the same as anything else they own. That has a consequence most families don't think through at the time of planning: once it's theirs, it's reachable by anyone with a legal claim against them.
A judgment creditor from a lawsuit, a bankruptcy filing, a business failure, or a divorce can all reach an inheritance that has already been distributed outright — particularly once it's been deposited into a joint account or used toward jointly owned property, where it becomes difficult to argue it was ever separate from the marital estate at all.
How a Spendthrift Trust Changes This — Utah Code § 75B-2-502
Instead of distributing a child's inheritance outright, a trust can direct that the child's share continue in a trust held for that child, rather than being paid out to them directly. If that trust contains a valid spendthrift provision, Utah law treats the beneficiary's interest very differently from property the beneficiary owns outright.
Under Utah Code § 75B-2-502, a spendthrift provision for a beneficiary other than the trust's creator is valid only if it restrains both voluntary and involuntary transfer of the beneficiary's interest — and this holds true even if the beneficiary also serves as trustee or co-trustee of the trust. Notably, the statute doesn't require elaborate drafting to accomplish this: language stating that a beneficiary's interest is held subject to a "spendthrift trust," or words of similar meaning, is legally sufficient on its own.
The practical effect: the beneficiary cannot sign away or pledge their interest in the trust, and — except for the specific exceptions discussed below — a creditor or assignee of the beneficiary cannot reach the trust's assets or a distribution before the beneficiary actually receives it in hand.
The protection attaches to the asset, not the person. A spendthrift provision doesn't protect your child from being sued or from owing money — it protects the specific assets still held in trust from being reachable to satisfy what they owe. Once a distribution is actually paid out to the beneficiary, that money is back to being ordinary, exposed personal property, just like an outright inheritance. The protection only works for as long as the assets stay in the trust.
Why This Also Tends to Protect Against Divorce
A separate but related benefit follows from how the trust is structured rather than from the spendthrift provision itself. Inherited property kept in a continuing trust for a beneficiary — rather than distributed to them outright — is generally treated as that beneficiary's separate property, not marital property subject to division if the beneficiary later divorces. This is a long-standing principle in how courts characterize inherited and gifted property, separate from the creditor protection a spendthrift clause provides.
The caveat matters: this separate-property treatment depends on the inheritance actually staying separate. If trust distributions are routinely deposited into a joint account, used to fund a jointly titled home, or otherwise mixed with marital assets, a court may find the inheritance was "commingled" and therefore subject to division after all. Keeping the inheritance inside the trust, distributed thoughtfully rather than dumped into joint finances, is what preserves this protection in practice.
What a Spendthrift Provision Cannot Stop — The Exceptions Under § 75B-2-503
A spendthrift provision is not absolute. Utah Code § 75B-2-503 lists specific claimants who can obtain a court order attaching present or future trust distributions to the beneficiary, even where a valid spendthrift provision exists:
- The beneficiary's own child, who holds a judgment or court order against the beneficiary for child support or maintenance
- A judgment creditor who provided services for the protection of the beneficiary's interest in the trust — for example, an attorney who helped the beneficiary establish or enforce their rights in the trust
- A crime victim who holds a judgment requiring the beneficiary to pay restitution under Utah's Crime Victims Restitution Act, or a similar law in another state
- The Utah Office of State Debt Collection, for collecting a civil accounts receivable or civil judgment of restitution owed by the beneficiary
In addition, a spendthrift provision is unenforceable against a claim of the State of Utah or the United States, to the extent a state or federal statute provides for that result.
Notice what is not on this list: an ordinary money judgment, a credit card debt, a business liability, or a beneficiary's general divorce settlement are not listed as statutory exceptions to a valid spendthrift provision. That's precisely the category of risk this kind of trust is designed to address.
| Exposure | Outright Inheritance | Held in Continuing Spendthrift Trust |
|---|---|---|
| Reachable by an ordinary judgment creditor | Yes | No — protected while assets remain in trust |
| Reachable in beneficiary's bankruptcy | Generally yes | Generally protected while assets remain in trust |
| Subject to division in beneficiary's divorce | Yes, especially once commingled | Generally protected, if kept separate from marital assets |
| Reachable for beneficiary's own child support obligation | Yes | Yes — § 75B-2-503(2)(a) exception applies |
| Beneficiary controls timing and use | Full control, immediately | Subject to trustee's discretion and distribution standard |
A common scenario: Parents in Provo build a revocable living trust that, at the second parent's death, divides their estate equally among three adult children. For two of the children, the trust directs an outright distribution. For the third — who owns a small contracting business with real liability exposure — the trust instead directs that her share continue in a separate trust for her benefit, with an independent successor trustee and a spendthrift provision, distributing for her health, education, maintenance, and support.
Eight years later, a subcontractor sues her business and wins a judgment that exceeds her insurance coverage. Her two siblings' inherited funds — distributed outright years earlier and long since mixed into their household finances — are fair game for their own creditors, should it ever come to that. Her share, still held in the continuing trust, is not reachable by the subcontractor's judgment. The trustee can continue making distributions to cover her ordinary living expenses without those distributions becoming attachable before she receives them.
Is your trust set up to protect what your children eventually receive?
Most revocable living trusts default to outright distributions at a certain age. A free consultation can walk through whether a continuing trust with a spendthrift provision makes sense for your family.Building This Into Your Existing Estate Plan
This is not a separate trust document or a complex new structure — it's a drafting choice within the revocable living trust most families already have or should have. Rather than directing the trustee to distribute each child's share outright at a certain age, the trust can direct that some or all of a beneficiary's share continue in trust for their lifetime, or until a series of staggered ages, with:
- A spendthrift provision satisfying Utah Code § 75B-2-502
- An independent or successor trustee — often not the beneficiary themselves, to avoid undermining the protection
- A distribution standard, commonly health, education, maintenance, and support, that allows the beneficiary to fully benefit from the trust without controlling it outright
- Guidance for the trustee on discretionary distributions for major life events — a home purchase, starting a business, education costs
The result is an inheritance the beneficiary genuinely benefits from — the trustee can fund a home down payment, cover education, or support ordinary living expenses — without that inheritance ever becoming an asset their own creditors, a bankruptcy trustee, or a divorcing spouse can reach.
Not the same tool as a Utah asset protection trust. If your goal is protecting assets you currently own from your own future creditors while you're still alive, see Utah Asset Protection Trust: Requirements and How It Works. The planning discussed in this article works in the other direction — protecting what your beneficiaries eventually receive from them.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
Yes. Instead of distributing an inheritance to a child outright, your trust can hold it in a continuing trust for that child with a spendthrift provision. Under Utah Code § 75B-2-502, a spendthrift provision is valid as long as it restrains both voluntary and involuntary transfer of the beneficiary's interest — meaning the child cannot sign the interest away, and a creditor generally cannot reach trust assets or a distribution before the child actually receives it.
-
Generally, yes, with an important caveat. Inherited assets kept in a continuing trust rather than distributed outright are typically treated as the beneficiary's separate property, not marital property subject to division in a divorce — as long as the funds are not commingled with marital assets, such as being deposited into a joint account or used to improve jointly owned property. The spendthrift provision itself blocks creditors from reaching the interest; it is the trust's continuing structure, kept separate from the marital estate, that does most of the work in a divorce context.
-
Utah Code § 75B-2-503 sets out specific exceptions. Even with a valid spendthrift provision, a court can order present or future trust distributions attached for: a beneficiary's child who holds a support or maintenance judgment against the beneficiary; a judgment creditor who provided services to protect the beneficiary's interest in the trust; a crime victim with a restitution judgment against the beneficiary; and the Utah Office of State Debt Collection, for a civil accounts receivable or judgment of restitution. A spendthrift provision is also unenforceable against a claim of the state or federal government to the extent a statute provides.
-
No — they protect different people. A Utah domestic asset protection trust, authorized under Utah Code §§ 75B-1-301 through 310, is a self-settled trust that protects the person who created it (the grantor) from their own future creditors while they remain a beneficiary. The trust planning discussed here protects a beneficiary — typically a child or grandchild — from that beneficiary's own future creditors and divorce, using a spendthrift provision in a trust the beneficiary did not create and does not control.
-
No. This protection is typically built directly into the revocable living trust you already have, or should have, as part of your estate plan. Rather than directing the trustee to distribute a child's share outright at your death, the trust can direct that the share continue in trust for that child — with an independent or successor trustee, a spendthrift provision, and a distribution standard such as health, education, maintenance, and support. The child can still benefit fully from the inheritance; they simply do not own it outright in a way that exposes it to their creditors or a divorce.